Comparative Analysis of Plate Girder Designs In The Composite Bridge Between AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2017 Regulation with SNI 1729: 2015

  • Donald Essen Faculty of Engineering, University Mercu Buana Jakarta, Indonesia (ID)
  • Ryza Nur Rohman Faculty of Engineering, University Mercu Buana Jakarta, Indonesia (ID)
Keywords: Composite Girder, Comparative Analysis of Design, SNI 1729: 2015, AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 2017

Viewed = 122 time(s)


In the world of construction there are various methods and types of materials used to support the passage of a construction work. One of them is composite girder plate. Composite girder plate is one of the many construction methods that combine two construction materials that are physically different in nature, namely concrete with steel. This type of composite girder plate construction is commonly used for bridge construction work with a fairly large span and width. In its use, of course, it must be preceded by stages of careful planning on a standard and valid basis as well. In the following research will discuss and look for similarities and differences regarding the two types of rules in the planning of composite girder plates, namely the rules of planning composite girder plates using AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 2017 with SNI 1729: 2015. After doing the initial stages of modeling using CSI Bridge software using the profile cross section constraints of the AASHTO provisions, the internal force obtained is Moment Force (Mu) of 3469.13 kNm and Shear Force (Vu) of 225.98 kNm. Then proceed with the analysis of calculations with the help of Microsoft Excel software namely calculating using the AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 2017 regulations for stability requirements of strong boundary conditions on the bending requirements. Then a Nominal Moment (ØMn) value of 6420.19 kNm is obtained. Then proceed to calculate the same planning constraints, but this time using SNI 1729: 2015 regulations. Obtained Nominal Moment Value (ØMn) of 6579.88 kNm. Then it can be concluded that the two regulations produce a safe and strong planning, of course in accordance with applicable regulations namely: Moment (Mu <ØMn).


Download data is not yet available.


Agustini, M., Warsito, W., & Suprapto, B. (2019). Studi Perencanaan Struktur Jembatan Komposit Pada Jembatan Ake Pariwama III Halmahera Timur. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 6(2), 165-171.

Bastian, F. D. (2018). Studi Alternatif Perencanaan Jembatan Dengan Konstruksi Plate Girder Pada Jembatan Pagerluyung Tol Mojokerto. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 2(2), 126-135.

Felsaputra, D. A., & Warsito, W. (2019). Studi Alternatif Perencanaan Jembatan Nglongsor Kabupaten Trenggalek Dengan Menggunakan Konstruksi Plate Girder. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 5(2), 90-102.

Indriani, J. (2018). Deformasi Struktur Jembatan Gantung Rangka Baja Khusus Pejalan Kaki Memakai Menara Baja dan Komposit (Doctoral dissertation).

Jayanti Anggraini, Anneke. (2016). Analisis Desain Jembatan Komposit Gelagar Baja Menggunakan Struktur Non-Prismatik. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 3(3/REKAT/16).

Junaidi, F. (2016). Perencanaan Balok Komposit Non-Prismatis Jembatan Underpass Kereta Api Pada Proyek Pembangunan Tol Surabaya-Mojokerto Jawa Timur. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 3(3/REKAT/16).

Priyono, A. (2014). Perhitungan Struktur Jembatan Komposit Jalan Marsda Abdurrahman Saleh Kota Samarinda Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Kurva S Jurnal Mahasiswa, 1(2), 1215-1234.

Putra, S., Syukri, S., & Mahyar, H. (2017). Perencanaan Gelagar Baja Pada Jembatan Desa Buket Linteung Kecamatan Langkahan Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Jurnal Sipil Sains Terapan, 1(1).

Sim, J. G. (2019). Shear buckling behavior of a plate composite girder using concrete-filled steel tube structures. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 1-8.

Wiyanto, D. Y. L. (2014). Perhitungan Struktur Jembatan Komposit Desa Perjiwa. Kurva S Jurnal Mahasiswa, 1(2), 947-960.

Received 2020-06-04
Published 2019-05-18
How to Cite
D. Essen and R. N. Rohman, “Comparative Analysis of Plate Girder Designs In The Composite Bridge Between AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2017 Regulation with SNI 1729: 2015”, J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24-39, May 2019.