Comparative Analysis Study Of ATC-40 and SNI 1726-2012 Guidelines for Beam Structure Performance and Column Trans Studio Apartments Applications Using Dynamic Response Spectrum Analysis Methods

  • Agyanata Tua Munthe Faculty of Engineering, Mercu Buana University Jakarta, Indonesia (ID)
  • Abdul Gafur Faculty of Engineering, Mercu Buana University Jakarta, Indonesia (ID)
Keywords: Response Spectrum, ATC-40, SNI 1726-2012

Viewed = 89 time(s)

Abstract

The earthquake that often hit Indonesia caused thousands of lives and caused damage to buildings. These earthquakes often occur because Indonesia is in two regions, namely the Pacific earthquake path (Circum Pacific Earthquake Belt) and the Asian earthquake lane (Trans Asiatic Earthquake Belt). Earthquake disasters cause damage to building structures. When an earthquake occurs, it is expected that the building can accept earthquake force at a certain level without significant damage to its structure. In general, earthquake analysis is divided into two major parts, namely static earthquake analysis and dynamic earthquake analysis. In buildings that are very high, irregular, multilevel, and buildings that require enormous accuracy are used dynamic analysis planning, which consists of a variety of spectral response analysis and dynamic time response dynamic analysis. This study aims to determine the building's security in terms of displacement, drift, and base shear. The method used is a dynamic analysis of the response spectrum using the ETABS program. The maximum total drift in the X direction is 0.0200475 m and in the Y direction is 0.020405 m, so the building is safe against ultimate boundary performance (0.02h) and service boundary performance {(0.03 / R) x h}. So that the displacement in the building does not exceed the maximum displacement, the building is safe from earthquake plans.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andriyanto Firman, (2014). Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung Bertingkat Dengan Analisis Riwayat Waktu Terhadap Drift dan Displacement Menggunakan Software Etabs, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Applied Technology Council 40 (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. Volume 1. Redwood City, California, U.S.A.

ASCE (2000). FEMA 356 - Prestandard And Commentary For The Seismic Rehabilitation Of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Washington, D.C.

Baiquny Febbrian, Donny (2014), Evaluasi Kinerja Gaya Gempa Pada Gedung Bertingkat Dengan Analisis Respon Spektrum Berdasarkan Base Shear, Displacement, dan Drift, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Luthfi Rifa’i, Muhammad (2014), Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Pada Gedung Bertingkat Dengan Analisis Dinamik Respon Spektrum Menggunakan Software Etabs, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Marwato Ary, (2014), Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung 10 Lantai Dengan Analisis Pushover Terhadap Drift Dan Displacement Menggunakan Software Etabs, Universitas Sebelas Maret

N. Patil, Mahes (2015), Seismic Analysis of Multistoried Building, M. Tech. (Structure) SVNIT

Nurhadi Muhammad, (2014), Evaluasi Kinerja Gaya Gempa Pada Struktur Gedung Bertingkat dengan Analisis Pushover Berdasar Pada Drift dan Displacement Menggunakan Etabs, Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Received 2019-04-07
Accepted 2019-06-23
Published 2019-07-06
Published
2019-07-06
Section
Articles
How to Cite
[1]
A. T. Munthe and A. Gafur, “Comparative Analysis Study Of ATC-40 and SNI 1726-2012 Guidelines for Beam Structure Performance and Column Trans Studio Apartments Applications Using Dynamic Response Spectrum Analysis Methods”, J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46-55, Jul. 2019.