Prohibition of Application of Restorative Justice Regarding Cases of Corruption Crimes by Police Investigators

Denzel Andersson Cahyono

doi:10.35877/454RI.daengku1722

Denzel Andersson Cahyono Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanegara, Jl. Letjen S. Parman No. 1, Jakarta Barat, 11440, Indonesia (ID)

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1722

Keywords: Restorative justice, Corruption Crime, Police Investigators

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine why Indonesian Police Investigators forbid the use of restorative justice in situations involving criminal acts of corruption. This study was motivated by a desire to learn more about the history of restorative justice and its potential effects in the context of dealing with corruption cases. This research combines a normative legal perspective with a descriptive analytic technique. The information utilized is secondary, meaning it was gathered from other sources. The study's findings reveal that Indonesian Police Investigators cannot utilize restorative justice in situations involving criminal acts of corruption since it violates the law, particularly the principles of criminal law, and has the potential to violate human rights. To guarantee fair and effective law enforcement, there must be a greater knowledge of restorative justice and the establishment of a better legal system.

References

Adami Chazawi, S. H. 2022. Hukum Pidana Materiil Dan Formil KORUPSI Di Indonesia. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Andi, Hamzah. 1991. “Korupsi Di Indonesia, Masalah Dan Pemecahannya.” Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2002. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.” Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arsyad, Jawade Hafidz. 2013. “Korupsi Dalam Perspektif HAN (Hukum Administrasi Negara).”

Atmasasmita, Romli. 1996. Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Perspektif Eksistensialisme Dan Abolisionisme. Eresco.

Flora, Henny Saida. 2018. “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 3(2):142–58.

Kansil, Christine S. T., and Christine S. T. Kansil. 2004. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana: Hukum Pidana Untuk Tiap Orang. Pradnya Paramita.

Makaro, M. Taufik. 2013. “Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak-Anak.” Jakarta: BPHN Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM.

Marshall, Tony F. 1999. Restorative Justice: An Overview. Home Office London.

Morrison, J. T., and A. JT. 1996. “Theoritical Study and Critique of Restorative Justice, in Burt Galaway and Joe Hudson, Eds., Restorative Justice: International Perspectives.”

Pangaribuan, Luhut M. P., Lay Judges, and Hakim Ad Hoc. 2009. “Suatu Studi Teoritis Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Purwoleksono, Didik Endro. 2019. “Hukum Pidana Untaian Pemikiran.”

Putri, Nella Sumika, and I. Tajudin. 2015. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Lalu Lintas Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice Sebagai Dasar Penghentian Penyidikan Dan Perwujudan Asas Keadilan Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan.” PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 2(1).

Suhariyanto, Budi. 2016. “Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi Demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 5(3):421–38.

Winarno, Nur Basuki. 2008. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Laksbang Mediatama, Yogyakarta.