ARTICLES · Volume 3, Issue 6 · 1084-1088 · December 2023 · Open Access

Polemic on Corruption Cases in Bengkulu Province during Ridwan Mukti's Reign

Daafi Aqshal Sonjaya, Muhammad Faridz Adrian, Andi Deandra Putra
Download PDF Set Alert Previous article Next article

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out polemic on corruption cases in Bengkulu Province during Ridwan Mukti’s Reign. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The data source used secondary data sources originating from books and scientific journals. The corruption case involving the Governor of Bengkulu, Ridwan Mukti, and related parties shows the continuation of corrupt practices in the government environment. In the chronology outlined, involvement in accepting bribes related to development projects, providing positions with personal interests, and threats to contractors who did not support certain politics were revealed. This case contains serious impacts not only at the individual level, but also on society, politics, economics, and bureaucracy.

References (25)

  1. Absadykov, A. (2020). Does Good Governance Matter? Kazakhstan’s Economic Growth and Worldwide Governance Indicators. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v10i1.2776
  2. Alfada, A. (2019). The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia: A threshold model. Heliyon, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02649
  3. Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Paltrinieri, A. (2020). Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda. International Business Review, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101660
  4. Carolina, Y., Haneda, J., & Haneda, J. (2022). COSO ERM AND THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS IN FRAUD PREVENTION (Survey on Internal Auditors in Indonesia). Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v14i2.48834
  5. Danuta, K. S. (2017). Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory dalam Pencegahan Fraud pada Proses Pengadaan melalui E-Procurement. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v1i2.826
  6. Jones, D. S. (2022). Challenges in combating corruption in Malaysia: issues of leadership, culture and money politics. Public Administration and Policy, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-01-2022-0002
  7. Kohler, J. C., & Dimancesco, D. (2020). The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk. In Global Health Action (Vol. 13, Issue sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694745
  8. Kozlovskyi, S., Nikolenko, L., Peresada, O., Pokhyliuk, O., Yatchuk, O., Bolgarova, N., & Kulhanik, O. (2020). Estimation level of public welfare on the basis of methods of intellectual analysis. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2020.03.06
  9. Luna-Pla, I., & Nicolás-Carlock, J. R. (2020). Corruption and complexity: a scientific framework for the analysis of corruption networks. Applied Network Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-020-00258-2
  10. Pyone, T., & Mirzoev, T. (2022). Feasibility of Good Governance at Health Facilities: A Proposed Framework and its Application Using Empirical Insights From Kenya. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.01

Keywords

Citation

Aqshal Sonjaya, D., Faridz Adrian, . M., & Putra, A. D. (2023). Polemic on Corruption Cases in Bengkulu Province during Ridwan Mukti’s Reign. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 3(6), 1084–1088. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku2204
PublishedDecember 31, 2023
Volume3 - 2023
Pages1084-1088