Predicting Student Academic Success Using Machine Learning Models: A Learning Analytics Approach in Higher Education
- Arief Hidayat — Universitas Wahid Hasyim, Indonesia
- Swasti Maharani — Universitas PGRI Madiun, Indonesia
- Dendi Pratama — Universitas Media Nusantara Citra, Indonesia
- Ramadiani Ramadiani — Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia
- S Sujito — Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said, Indonesia
- Addy Septyawan — Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
- Dian Wardiana Sjuchro — Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
- Publication History
- Published online: February 28, 2026
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku4881
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2026 Arief Hidayat, Swasti Maharani, Dendi Pratama, Ramadiani Ramadiani, S Sujito, Addy Septyawan, Dian Wardiana Sjuchro
- User License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
Abstract
Rapid deployment of digital learning technologies in the higher education sector has created immense amounts of educational data that could be leveraged to enhance student success and institutional effectiveness. Nevertheless, student dropout, poor academic performance, and lack of retention continue to plague universities across the world. In most cases, identification of academically struggling students is often late since existing models are largely reactive. Therefore, there is need for development of advanced learning analytics models that are able to forecast student performance in higher education institutions. The current study seeks to create an artificial neural network (ANN)-based learning analytics framework to predict student success in higher education institutions. A predictive analytical approach based on quantitatively evaluating a sample of 1,000 undergraduate students was used in the current study. Various attributes used to evaluate the students included demographic information, academic performance, LMS activity, and learning behaviors. Learning analytics indicators used in the model included previous GPA, attendance rate, assignment completion rate, quiz scores, logins per week, learning hours per week, discussion engagement, engagement index, interaction scores, and learning consistency. In the analysis, the model was validated and tested against accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, confusion matrix, and cross validation tests. Results showed that accuracy, precision, recall, F1-Score, and ROC-AUC of the ANN model were 92.8%, 91.4%, 93.7%, 92.5%, and 0.96, respectively. Based on these outcomes, previous GPA, attendance rate, assignment completion rate, and various engagement indicators were found to be the strongest predictors of student success in college. On the theoretical front, contributions of this study include AI-assisted student performance and behavior prediction. Practically, a sophisticated warning system was developed in this study to assist in effective academic advisement and planning for student retention and academic improvement strategies.
References (25)
- Al-Momani, M. O., & Alsmadi, M. A. (2020). Students’ degree of possessing digital-citizenship skills from their points of view at Al-Balqa Applied University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3335–3345. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080805
- Al-Qora’n, L. F., Jawarneh, A., & Nganji, J. T. (2023). Toward Creating Software Architects Using Mobile Project-Based Learning Model (Mobile-PBL) for Teaching Software Architecture. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7030031
- Al Qundus, J., Paschke, A., Kumar, S., & Gupta, S. (2019). Calculating Trust in Domain Analysis: Theoretical Trust Model. International Journal of Information Management, 48(October), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.012
- Ali, D., Fatemi, Y., Boskabadi, E., Nikfar, M., Ugwuoke, J., & Ali, H. (2024). ChatGPT in Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060643
- Almansour, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and resource optimization: A study of Fintech start-ups. Resources Policy, 80, 103250. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESOURPOL.2022.103250
- Arsad, P. M., Buniyamin, N., & Manan, J. L. A. (2014). Prediction of engineering students’ academic performance using artificial neural network and linear regression: A comparison. 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Engineering Education: Aligning Engineering Education with Industrial Needs for Nation Development, ICEED 2013, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2013.6908300
- Ashour, S. (2019). Analysis of the attrition phenomenon through the lens of university dropouts in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2019-0110
- Avenue, C., Box, P. O., Akom, A., Shah, A., Nakai, A., Cruz, T., October, W., Stella, T., Room, C., Susskind, L., Cunningham, D., Colab, M. I. T., Mit, K. H., Units, I., Objectives, N., Requirements, C., Assignments, R., Neil, S. O., Schaff, K., … Welch, B. (2015). College of Education and Human Development. Harvard Educational Review.
- Barbancho, J., León, C., Molina, F. J., & Barbancho, A. (2007). Using artificial intelligence in routing schemes for wireless networks. Computer Communications, 30(14–15), 2802–2811. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMCOM.2007.05.023
- Bhati, A., & Song, I. (2019). New methods for collaborative experiential learning to provide personalised formative assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9173
- Civit, M., Civit-Masot, J., Cuadrado, F., & Escalona, M. J. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based music generation: Scope, applications, and future trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 209(January), 118190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118190
- Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022). Cognitive Challenges in Human–Artificial Intelligence Collaboration: Investigating the Path Toward Productive Delegation. Information Systems Research, 33(2), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1079
- Gomez-Cabello, C. A., Borna, S., Pressman, S., Haider, S. A., Haider, C. R., & Forte, A. J. (2024). Artificial-Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Current Clinical Implementations. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(3), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030045
- Ismaya, I., Mahmuddin, M., Tike, A., & Ibrahim, I. (2023). Literacy Education: Communication Literacy Model in Tudang Sipulung Culture in Patondonsalu Village at Enrekang District. SAGA: Journal of Technology and Information System, 1(1), 18–21. https://journal.mediadigitalpublikasi.com/index.php/saga/article/view/15
- Kennedy, G., De Barba, P., Coffrin, C., & Corrin, L. (2015). Predicting success: How learners’ prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 16-20-Marc, 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723593
- Latham, A., Crockett, K., & Mclean, D. (2013). Profiling student learning styles with multilayer perceptron neural networks. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2013, 2510–2515. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2013.428
- Ledwith, A., & Rísquez, A. (2008). Using anti?plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802211562
- Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (n.d.). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education. Pearson. Retrieved October 13, 2018, from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475756/
- Luescher-Mamashela, T. M. (2013). Student representation in university decision making: good reasons, a new lens? Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.625496
- Paiva, T., & Tadeu, P. (2015). PRODUZ@IDEIA– An Approach Project to Develop Entrepreneurship in Primary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1908–1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.854
- Rahim, R. (2020). Educational Data Mining (EDM) on the use of the internet in the world of Indonesian education. TEM Journal. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-39
- Sukesi, T. W., Sulistyawati, S., Yuliansyah, H., Mulasari, S. A., Khusna, A. N., Tentama, F., Sudarsono, B., & Ghozali, F. A. (2023). Home Environment and Larva Indices: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Indonesian Transition to Endemic COVID-19. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 19(1), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v19i1.42605
- Wimatra, A., Nasution, D., Harumy, T. H. F., & Sunardi. (2016). Backpropagation model for BIDIKMISI recipients. Internetworking Indonesia Journal, 8(2).
- Xing, W., Li, C., Chen, G., Huang, X., Chao, J., Massicotte, J., & Xie, C. (2020). Automatic Assessment of Students’ Engineering Design Performance Using a Bayesian Network Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960422
- Yang, S. J. H., Ogata, H., Matsui, T., & Chen, N. S. (2021). Human-centered artificial intelligence in education: Seeing the invisible through the visible. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2(January), 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100008
Keywords
Citation
Statements

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.