Adaptation of the Global Motivation Scale (GMS-28) in Indonesian Version

Anissa Cessarea; Urip Purwono; Asteria Devy Kumalasari

doi:10.35877/454RI.daengku1463

Anissa Cessarea Universitas Padjadjaran (ID)
Urip Purwono Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia (ID)
Asteria Devy Kumalasari Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia (ID)

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1463

Keywords: Global Motivation Scale, adaptation scale, psychometric testing, motivation scale

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

Motivation is one of the important variables for study, whereas many motivational studies have been conducted to predict learning, performance, and behavior change. The motivational scale that has gone through psychometric testing is required in motivational research to accurately describe the construct. There is still low availability of motivational scale in Indonesia that has passed the psychometric testing. Therefore, this study aims to adapt the Global Motivation Scale (GMS-28) into Indonesian. The adaptation process refers to the adaptation guidelines by the International Test Commission, where the process of adaptation also involves psychometric testing. Data collection was carried out using an online questionnaire on 383 participants aged 18-25 years. The psychometric test was carried out using internal consistency reliability and validity based on internal structure. The internal consistency scale has revealed all acceptable reliability coefficients aspects with a range of a = 0.703 – 0.810. Item analysis pointed out that all items have good item-total correlation and item mean. Findings from First-order Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that all aspects have acceptable model fit and all of the items significantly measures the aspects on GMS-28. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the Indonesian version of the GMS-28 is suitable for use for further studies. However, further testing needs to be done using a larger sample to be used in all Indonesian populations.

Author Biographies

Urip Purwono, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Asteria Devy Kumalasari, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

References

Ates, O. T., & Buluc, B. (2015). The relationship between the emotional intelligence, motivation and organizational commitment of primary school teachers. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 17, 31–49. www.majersite.org/issue17/17_3.pdf
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Gulford, 44(05), 44-2769-44–2769. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2769
Cadwallader, S., Jarvis, C. B., Bitner, M. J., & Ostrom, A. L. (2010). Frontline employee motivation to participate in service innovation implementation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 251–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0160-2
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(10.1016).
GEORGESCU, D. N., DUMITRACHE (TORCICĂ), G., & JOIȚA (LEAFU), M. (2020). The Relationship Between Motivation and Performance of Teachers in Increasing the Quality of Education. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Economics & Administrative Sciences, 5(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumeneas/5.1/20
Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003a). Global Motivation Scale (Gms-28). Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 29(8).
Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003b). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253297
Iliescu, D. (2017). Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations. Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316273203
Jolliff, A., & Strubler, D. (2021). Integrating Model of Resilience, Engagement, and Motivation. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(2), 178–189. https://doi.org/10.37391/ijbmr.090208
Litwin, M. (2011). How to Assess and Interpret Survey Psychometrics. How to Assess and Interpret Survey Psychometrics. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984409
Mostafa, H., & Lim, Y. (2020). Examining the relationship between motivations and resilience in different international student groups attending u.S. universities. Journal of International Students, 10(2), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i2.603
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, . E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Treuren, G. J., Manoharan, A., Stothard, C., & Hutchinson, C. (2017). The relationship between self-determination theory, motivational types, emotional labour and client embeddedness. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-relationship-between-self-determination-theory%2C-Treuren-Manoharan/037b2b283a0e867f0313792e221fa342e3773698
Urbanaviciute, I., Kairys, A., Juodkune, I., & Liniauskaite, A. (2013). The Lithuanian Version of the Global Motivation Scale: Testing Its Reliability and Factorial Validity. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 14(1/2), 38–52. http://ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=96165064&site=ehost-live
Vallerand, R. J. (2012). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport and Physical Activity: A Review and a Look at the Future. Handbook of Sport Psychology: Third Edition, 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch3
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 21(3), 323–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079855
Vedsted, P., Sokolowski, I., & Heje, H. N. (2008). Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 26(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430802294803
Whitfield, K. M., & Wilby, K. J. (2021). Developing Grit, Motivation, and Resilience: To Give Up on Giving In. Pharmacy, 9(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9020109