The Influence of Individual Characteristics, Work Achievement, Ability, and Work Satisfaction on Employee Performance at Panai Hulu District Office Tanjung Sarang Elang

Jimmi  Tasman; Mulya  Rafika; Abd Halim

doi:10.35877/454RI.daengku1596

Jimmi Tasman Universitas Labuhanbatu (ID)
Mulya Rafika Universitas Labuhanbatu (ID)
Abd Halim Universitas Labuhanbatu (ID)

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1596

Keywords: Individual Characteristic, Work Achievement, Ability, Satisfaction, Performance.

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of individual characteristics, work performance, ability and job satisfaction on employee performance at the Panai Hulu sub-district office, Tanjung Sarang Elang. The research method used in this research is quantitative. In this study, the population was 40 employees of the Panai Hulu Sub-district Office, Tanjung Sarang Elang. The research sample used a saturated sampling technique by attracting the entire existing population to be used as a research sample with a total of 40 people. Data collection techniques used were observation, documentation studies and questionnaires. The method of analysis of this research is multiple linear regression with the SPSS program. The results of the study prove that individual characteristics have a positive and significant effect on employee performance at the Panai Hulu Tanjung Sarang Elang sub-district office. Work performance has a positive and significant effect on employee performance at the Panai Hulu Tanjung Sarang Elang sub-district office. Capability has a positive and significant effect on employee performance at the Panai Hulu Sub-district Office, Tanjung Sarang Elang. Job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on employee performance at the Panai Hulu Sub-district Office, Tanjung Sarang Elang. Individual Characteristics, Work Performance, Capabilities and Job Satisfaction simultaneously have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance at the Panai Hulu Sub-district Office, Tanjung Sarang Elang. The coefficient of determination is 0.754, meaning that employee performance can be explained by the variables Individual Characteristics (X1), Work Performance (X2), Capability (X3) and Job Satisfaction (X4) of 75.4%, while the remaining 24.6% can be explained by variables others that were not examined in this study.

References

A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2011). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Akmal, A., & Tamini, I. (2015). Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. 04, 59–68.
Ariyani, R., & Sugiyanto, E. (2020). PENGARUH KOMITMEN AFEKTIF, KOMITMEN BERKELANJUTAN DAN KOMITMEN NORMATIF TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN (Studi Perusahaan BUMN X di Semarang). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Ubhara, 2, 113. https://doi.org/10.31599/jmu.v2i2.772
Armiaty, R., & Ariffin, Z. (2014). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Frontliner, (Studi pada Cabang Bank Kalsel di Wilayah Banjarmasin). Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen, 2(2), 213–236.
Bahri, S., & Chairatun Nisa, Y. (2017). Pengaruh Pengembangan Karir Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.30596/jimb.v18i1.1395
Boyatzis dalam Priansa. (2014). pengertian Kompetensi. Boyatzis Dalam Priansa (2014), 2(1), 1–15.
Darmawan, A., & Putri, M. A. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Akuntabilitas, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v10i1.6109
Endiartia, J. J. (2019). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi dan Jabatan Administrator di Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional. Civil Service: Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS, 13(2), 39–50. http://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/view/222
Ghozali, I., & Latan, hengky. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Techniques and Applications using SmartPLS 3. In Diponegoro University Press.
Hermita, R., Agussalim, M., & Yuliastanty, S. (2022). PENGARUH SEMANGAT DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA MASA COVID-19 DI KANTOR BADAN KESATUAN BANGSA DAN POLITIK (KESBANGPOL) KABUPATEN AGAM. Matua Jurnal, 4(1), 143–154.
Ilyas, Y. (2002). Kinerja: Teori, penilaian dan penelitian. Depok: Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kesehatan FKMUI.
James Gibson, John Ivancevich, R. K. (2011). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. McGraw Hill.
Juniantara, I. W., & Riana, I. G. (2015). Pengaruh motivasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan koperasi di Denpasar. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 4(9), 611–628.
Karmila, N., & Kadarusman. (2020). Kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel mediasi pengaruh antara komitmen afektif dan komitmen berkelanjutan dengan kinerja pegawai di sekretariat daerah kabupaten pasuruan. Inovasi Jurnal Ekonomi Keuangan Dan Manajement, 16(2), 320–326.
Mangkunegara. (2014). KESEHATAN KERJA. In Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indosnesia. Pendekatan Administratif Dan Operasional (pp. 161–162). gramedia.
Pasolong, H. (2014). Teori administrasi publik. Alfabeta Bandung.
Rahayu, M. S., & Rushadiyati, R. (2021). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Karakteristik Individu Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan SMK Kartini. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.52643/jam.v11i2.1880
Rini, A. A. S., Adelia, C., & Mujiati, N. W. (2016). Pengaruh Kompensasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan di RS Dharma Kerti Tabanan. None, 5(6), 246852.
Riyanto, S., & Anto, D. C. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Semangat Kerja dan Tim Kerja Terhadap Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil, 12(2), 81–90.
sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif . In 2017 .
Wandansari, K. (2018). expetasi disiplin kerja. Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Dan Motivasi Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pns Di Sekretariat Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi, 13(1), 231.
Wiliam J. Stanton. (2013). analisis kinerja pegawai. In Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan (pp. 10–12). karya kencana.