Quadruple Helix Model Philosophy to Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Creativity
- Publication History
- Published online: August 31, 2023
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1779
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2023 Achmad Akmalluddin, Suryo Ediyono
Abstract
This study explains and analyzes how the Quadruple Helix model improves Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) creativity. Government, industry, academia, and society collaborate on innovation and development under the Quadruple Helix paradigm. This strategy lets stakeholders collaborate to boost CSR's beneficial impact. The Quadruple Helix model in CSR is examined using ontological, epistemological, and axiological methods. This study analyzes CSR, the Quadruple Helix model, and scientific philosophy literature. This study found that the ontological approach examines CSR stakeholders' reality and interactions. The epistemological method examines how entities collaborate to learn about CSR. The axiological method evaluates CSR initiatives for fairness, sustainability, and social relevance. The Quadruple Helix CSR methodology can boost innovation and effect. Government, industry, academia, and society may collaborate and innovate to create more holistic and sustainable CSR solutions. Understanding the Quadruple Helix model's CSR philosophy. This study shows that collaborative and multidisciplinary approaches improve CSR creativity and effectiveness. More research is needed to confirm these findings.
References (16)
- Anthony, G. (2017). konsekuensi-konsekuensi Modernitas. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.
- Kafaa, K. A. (2019). Social capital and multi-stakeholders cooperation as a foundation of corporate social responsibility. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 3(3), 365–381.
- Misnawati, D. (2023). COMMUNICATION OF MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN THE MELEMANG TRADITION OF KARANG RAJA MUARA ENIM VILLAGE. Sosiohumaniora, 25(1), 21–28.
- Misnawati, D., Fadhila, L., Candrasari, Y., & Akmaluddin, A. (2023). The Cultural Dynamism of Wong Ayeb and Wong Palembang in Kuto Batu. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, 12(1).
- Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif edisi revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
- Mulyana, S., & Sutapa, S. (2014). Peningkatan kapabilitas inovasi, keunggulan bersaing dan kinerja melalui pendekatan quadruple helix: Studi pada industri kreatif sektor fashion. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 13(3), 304–321.
- Nurati, D. E. (2019). Penerapan Program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Menciptakan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) pada PT. PLN (Persero) Area Surakarta. Research Fair Unisri, 3(1).
- Retnaningsih, H. (2015). Permasalahan corporate social responsibility (csr) dalam rangka pemberdayaan masyarakat. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 6(2), 177–188.
- Rohmawati, E., & Sutapa, S. (2020). PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (GCG) TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN (PBV) DENGAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING. Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Ekonomi.
- Said, A. L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility dalam Perspektif Governance. Deepublish.
- Saleh, A., & Sihite, M. (2020). Strategi komunikasi untuk program corporate social responsibility dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. Jurnal Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 98–105.
- Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
- Sultoni, M. H. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility (Kajian Korelasi Program CSR terhadap Citra Perusahaan). Duta Media.
- Susanto, A. (2021). Filsafat ilmu: Suatu kajian dalam dimensi ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis. Bumi Aksara.
- Susetiawan, S. (2012). Implementasi CSR dalam arena civil society: Antara idealisme dan realitas. . In Susetiawan (Ed.), Corporate social responsibility: Komitmen untuk pemberdayaan masyarakat. Azzagrafika, 3–30.
- Yuda, T. K. (2016). Memaknai ulang corporate social responsibility: Upaya mewujudkan fair responsibility. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 19(3), 200–217.
