ARTICLES · Volume 4, Issue 1 · 172-182 · February 2024 · Open Access

Indonesia’s Responsibility as a Non-Party to the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugees in its Protection

Ibrahim Sagio
Download PDF Set Alert Previous article

Abstract

Under ordinary circumstances, someone who enters other countries shall be provided with travel documents and required visa as entry permit. On the other hand,  if they enter  to the territory of another country because of feeling well-founded fear, such as their safety are threatened; and the country of their origin occurs social unrest or war. Therefore, the person may not have complete travel documents and visas. Movement of people who want to enjoy the protection of another country because they feel unsafe in their own country can be filed a request for refugee status. International refugee problem (Refugee) has existed since 1921, the prior  international community responded to such events to the preparation of the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugee. Nowadays, many countries have ratified them. In both these legal instruments, these contained provisions on international protection standards to international refugees for the states parties. For the countries that  are not a party to the Convention and the Protocol, such as the Indonesian state, is not bound to the provisions of these legal instruments. Indonesia as well as other countries that have not ratified, then they have only a moral obligation  or humanitarian responsibility. Based on the principle of humanity in the entire country, although they have not yet ratified, there is no a reason to refuse in protecting the refugees.

References (21)

  1. Administrator. (n.d.). 84 Warga Asing Cari Suaka di Makassar.
  2. Baldinger, D. (2015). The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. In Vertical Judicial Dialogues in Asylum Cases.
  3. Beshir, H. (2017). Factors Affecting Savings as Means of Economic Growth in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 26(2), 59–88.
  4. Havid, A. S. (2004). Pengungsi dalam Kerangka Kebijakan Keimigrasian Indonesia Kini dan yang Akan Datang. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol2.1.5
  5. Kusumaatmadja, M., & Agoes, E. R. (2015). Pengantar Hukum Internasional.
  6. Lubis, I., Murwadji, T., Sukarja, D., & Rosmalinda, R. (2022). Penetration of International Economic Law in the Development of the Cyber Notary Concept in Indonesia. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.868
  7. Lubis, M. I. (2017). Implementation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and Law No. 5 of 1990 on the Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and Its Ecosystems in Law Enforcement Efforts and Guarantees of Environmental Rights in Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v2i01.16635
  8. Pham, H. S. T., Nguyen, A. N., & Johnston, A. (2022). Economic policies and technological development of Vietnam’s electronics industry. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2020.1809055
  9. Razy, F. (2023). Protection of Appointed Children’s Rights According to Law Number 35 of 2014 Concerning Child Protection. International Journal of Law and Public Policy (IJLAPP), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0501.413
  10. RI. (1992). Undang-Undang No.9 Tahun 1992 tentang Keimigrasian.

Keywords

Citation

Sagio, I. (2024). Indonesia’s Responsibility as a Non-Party to the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugees in its Protection. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 4(1), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku2444
PublishedFebruary 28, 2024
Volume4 - 2024
Pages172-182