Access to Justice for Women: A Comparative Study between Subarnachar and Begumganj Upazila of Noakhali District

Nazmun Sakib Ety; Badsha Mia

doi:10.35877/454RI.daengku2959

Nazmun Sakib Ety Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Noakhali Science and Technology University (NSTU), Noakhali-3814, Bangladesh (BD)
Badsha Mia Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Noakhali Science and Technology University (NSTU), Noakhali-3814, Bangladesh (BD)

https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku2959

Keywords: Access to justice, legal empowerment, social constraints, legal awareness, and efficiency.

Viewed = 0 time(s)

Abstract

Access to justice is the first step towards justice in the current legal system and is recognized as a fundamental human right in both the Constitution of Bangladesh and several international conventions. Despite this recognition, many Bangladeshi citizens, particularly women, face significant barriers to accessing justice due to gender and other factors. Access to justice is an important human right, but women in rural areas often face significant challenges in exercising this right. This study compares women's access to justice in two upazilas of Noakhali district: Subarnachar and Begumganj. By examining the sociocultural, economic and institutional elements that influence women's ability to seek and pursue legal remedies, this study highlights the differences between the two regions. Data obtained through interviews, questionnaires and focus group discussions with women, lawyers and community leaders. The study shows that while both upazilas face challenges such as patriarchal norms, lack of legal awareness and limited access to legal representation, the intensity and nature of these challenges differ significantly between Subarnachar and Begumganj. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions that address the specific barriers faced by women in each upazila and promote equal access to justice. This study contributes to the broader discourse on gender and justice in Bangladesh and provides insights for policymakers, legal practitioners and civil society organizations working to reinforce the legal empowerment of women in rural areas.

References

1. Ahmed, C. J. (2012). Legal aid and women’s access to justice in Bangladesh: A drizzling in the desert. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 8-14.
2. Begum, A., & Saha, N. K. (2017). Women's Access to Justice in Bangladesh: Constraints and Way Forward. JMCL, 44, 39.
3. Chowdhury J.A. (2020). ADR Theories and Practices: A glimpse on access to justice and ADR in Bangladesh. 3rd edition. Dhaka: University of Dhaka
4. Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. (2008). Making the law work for everyone (Vol. 2). UN.
5. Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972. (1972). The Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Retrieved August 22, 2024, from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/
6. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 1979. (1979). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 34/180. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaties/cedawinlaw.gov.bd/
7. Cranston, R., & de Mendonca, M. L. V. P. (1997). Access to justice in South and South-east Asia. In Good Government and Law: Legal and Institutional Reform in Developing Countries (pp. 233-257). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
8. Fanton, M., & Valdevino Oliveira Silva, W. (2023). Rawls’ Theory of Justice. In Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics (pp. 1539-1544). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
9. Hasle, L. (2003). Too poor for rights? Access to justice for poor women in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Development Studies, 29(3/4), 99-136.
10. Hossaini, M. R. I., & Hossain, M. S. (2017). Legal aid: A process to ensure access to justice and human rights in Bangladesh. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(2), 56-63.
11. Hutchinson, A.C. (1990). Access to Civil Justice, Carcwell, Toronto, 181.
12. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966. (1966). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaties/ccpr
13. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966. (1966). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaties/cescr
14. Khair, S. (2001). Alternative Approaches to Justice: A Review of ADR Initiatives under the Democracy Partnership. The Asia Foundation, Dhaka, 16.
15. Khair, S. (2007) “Legal Empowerment of the Poor and the Disadvantaged: Strategies, Achievements and Challenges”, CIDA, Dhaka, 2007.
16. Lam, J. H. (2006). The rise of the NGO in Bangladesh: Lessons on improving access to justice for women and religious minorities. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev., 38, 101.
17. Macdonald, R. A., & Ontario Law Reform Commission. (1995). Study Paper on Prospects for Civil Justice. Ontario Law Reform Commission.
18. Module 1. (2018). “The Theory and Practice of Women’s Access to Justice Programming,” UN Women, UNDP, UNODC, OHCHR, 8-9.
19. Naznin, S. A. (2021). Women's right to access to justice: The role of public interest litigation in Bangladesh. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 21(2), 99-117.
20. Siri Gloppen (2006). “Courts and Social Transformation: An Analytical Framework”, in: Roberto Gargarella, Pilar Domingo and Theunis Roux (eds.), Courts and Social Transformations in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor?,Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 46.
21. The Acid Crimes Control Act, 2002. (2002). Act No. 1 of 2002. Retrieved from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/
22. The Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act, 2010. (2010). Act No. 58 of 2010. Retrieved from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/
23. The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1980. (1980). Act No. 35 of 1980. Retrieved from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), The General Comment No. 9, Para 9.
24. The Family Courts Ordinance, 1985. (1985). Ordinance No. 18 of 1985. Retrieved from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/
25. The Suppression of Women and Children (Repression) Act, 2000. (2000). Act No. 8 of 2000. Retrieved from http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/
26. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948. (1948). United Nations General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
27. Women’s Legal and Human Rights Bureau (WLB), (2010). “Mapping and Analysis of Domestic Legal Remedies to issues of Violence against Women (VAW)”. Retrieved from: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/AccesstoJustice/WomensLegalAndHumanRightsBureau.pdf
28. World Bank (1999). “Barriers to access to justice” (2008). Michel Anderson, “Access to justice and legal process making legal Institution Responsive to Poor People in LDCs”, Paper for discussion at WDR meeting 16-17 August, 1999, Access to Justice Practice Note, UNDP, 9/3/2004.