OPTIMIST-G (Optimization of Metacognitive Thinking Skills through STEAM-Based Gamification) in Chemical Bonding Learning
- Publication History
- Published online: February 28, 2025
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku3748
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2025 Dewi Satria Ahmar, Muhammad Fath Azzajjad
Abstract
By using a STEAM-Based Gamification method, this study seeks to maximize students' capacity for metacognitive thinking when learning chemical bonds. In the odd semester of 2023, 28 Biology Education students in class C participated in a quantitative study using a one-group pretest-posttest design. The metacognition questionnaire and the pretest-posttest were the primary tools utilized, and the paired t-test and Effect Size (Cohen's d) were employed to analyze the results. After using STEAM-Based Gamification, students' metacognitive thinking skills significantly improved, according to the results (p-value <0.05). According to the Effect Size value (Cohen's d = 2.63), this approach has a very significant impact. The learning strategy planning component saw the largest growth (+35.6%), demonstrating students' growing capacity to oversee their own learning. According to these results, STEAM-Based Gamification may be widely used to teach difficult chemical topics. By developing more interactive, reflexive, and student-centered learning experiences and enhancing their preparedness for the challenges of the Education 4.0 age, this strategy has the potential to transform the educational paradigm in the future.
References
- Agus Supriyadi, Desy Desy, Yayat Suharyat, Tomi Apra Santosa, & Aulia Sofianora. (2023). The Effectiveness of STEM-Integrated Blended Learning on Indonesia Student Scientific Literacy: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Education and Literature, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.55606/ijel.v2i1.53
Ahmar, D. S., Azzajjad, M. F., & Syahrir, Muh. (2020). Students’ Representation Ability in Chemistry. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.asci22124
Ahmar, D. S., Magfirah, M., Poba, D., & Azzajjad, M. F. (2023). Gamification Learning integrated with Local Wisdom based on Character Education, is There an Effect on Problem Solving Ability? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7614–7620. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.4968
AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., & Al-Qahtani, M. (2023). SWOM strategy and influence of its using on developing mathematical thinking skills and on metacognitive thinking among gifted tenth-grade students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12994
Al-Gaseem, M., Bakkar, B., & Al-Zoubi, S. (2020). Metacognitive thinking skills among talented science education students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.707205
Alghamdi, A. A. (2023). Exploring Early Childhood Teachers’ Beliefs About STEAM Education in Saudi Arabia. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01303-0
Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
Azzajjad, M. F., Ahmar, D. S., & Syahrir, Muh. (2020). The Effect of Animation Media in Discovery Learning Model on Students’ Representation Ability on Chemical Equilibrium Materials. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.asci22125
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Boice, K. L., Jackson, J. R., Alemdar, M., Rao, A. E., Grossman, S., & Usselman, M. (2021). Supporting teachers on their STEAM journey: A collaborative STEAM teacher training program. Education Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030105
Dennis, J. L., & Somerville, M. P. (2023). Supporting thinking about thinking: examining the metacognition theory-practice gap in higher education. Higher Education, 86(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00904-x
Desoete, A., & De Craene, B. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: an overview. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01060-w
Febrianti, T. S., & Dasari, D. (2024). Creativity Increment and GeoGebra Classroom Quality: Impact on Student Learning. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i1.770
Furnham, A., & Cheng, H. (2024). The role of parents, teachers, and pupils in IQ test scores: Correlates of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) from 74 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112513
Harmer, S. P., & Groß, K. (2023). How Suitable Are Explanation Videos for the Chemistry Classroom? Analysing and Evaluating an Explanation Video on Metal Bonding. In Contributions from Science Education Research (Vol. 13). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32225-9_9
Hu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Growth mindset mediates perceptions of teachers’ and parents’ process feedback in digital reading performance: Evidence from 32 OECD countries. Learning and Instruction, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101874
Kummanee, J., Nilsook, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2020). Digital learning ecosystem involving steam gamification for a vocational innovator. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.7.1420
Lahlali, A., Chafiq, N., Radid, M., Atibi, A., El Kababi, K., Srour, C., & Moundy, K. (2023). Students’ Alternative Conceptions and Teachers’ Views on the Implementation of Pedagogical Strategies to Improve the Teaching of Chemical Bonding Concepts. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i6.41391
Laukaityte, I., Rolfsman, E., & Wiberg, M. (2024). TIMSS vs. PISA: what can they tell us about student success?—a comparison of Swedish and Norwegian TIMSS and PISA 2015 results with a focus on school factors. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323687
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Sihombing, R. U., Naga, D. S., & Rahayu, W. (2018). A RASCH MODEL MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS ON SCIENCE LITERACY TEST OF INDONESIAN STUDENTS: SMART WAY TO IMPROVE THE LEARNING ASSESSMENT. Indonesian Journal of Educational Review, 6(1).
Wannapiroon, N., & Pimdee, P. (2022). Thai undergraduate science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) creative thinking and innovation skill development: a conceptual model using a digital virtual classroom learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10849-w
Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Talib, C. A. (2024). EXPLORING CONTRIBUTING FACTORS TO PISA 2022 MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT: INSIGHTS FROM INDONESIAN TEACHERS. Infinity Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139-156