TAM Approach: Effect of Security on Customer Behavioral Intentions to Use Mobile Banking

Abstract
As the use of mobile banking continues to grow, attention must be paid to the security of financial transactions. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of security levels on the intent of users of mobile banking. This study uses the widely used Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to investigate user acceptance of information technology. By distributing an online survey, we used mobile banking to collect data from 100 respondents. The data analysis was processed using a SmartPLS application with structural equation modeling (SEM) methods. The results of this analysis show that the security of mobile banking has a significant positive impact on the perceived usefulness of mobile banking. However, security is not the main reason users use mobile banking. This means that customers will continue to use mobile banking, regardless of security. In addition, security does not significantly affect the ease of use of mobile banking. The study also found that the benefits of mobile banking have a significant impact on user intent. The ease of use of mobile banking also has a significant impact on the perceived benefits
References
Al-jabri, I. M., & Sohail, M. S. (2013). Mobile Banking Adoption : Application of Diffusion of Innovation Theory. December.
Amin, H. (2006). Internet Banking Adoption Among Young Intellectuals. 1–7.
Anggie, A. (2021). Transaksi Mobile dan Internet Banking Melonjak 300 Persen di 2021. IDXChannel. https://www.idxchannel.com/banking/transaksi-mobile-dan-internet-banking-melonjak-300-persen-di-2021
BPS. (2020). Statistik Telekomunikasi Indonesia 2020. Badan Pusat Statistik, 06300.2113, 329. https://www.bps.go.id/
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model : three experiments. 45, 19–45.
Doll, W. J., Hendrickson, A., & Deng, X. (1998). Using Davis’s perceived usefulness and ease‐of‐use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multigroup invariance analysis. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 839–869.
Dufour, A., Lajeunesse, K., Pipada, R., Xu, S., & Nomee, J. (2017). The Effect of Data Security Perception on Wearable Device Acceptance : A Technology Acceptance Model. 1–6.
F.D.Davis, J. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End User Informastion System: Theory and Results. Science (New York, N.Y.), 146(3652), 1–291. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14224511
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (2016). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Govender, I. (2014). A Study of Mobile Banking Adoption among University Students Using an Extended TAM. 5(7), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n7p451
Intan, N., & Yolandha, F. (2021). OJK Catat Transaksi Mobile Banking Capai Rp 4.684 T. Republika.Co.Id. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r1ko2j370/ojk-catat-transaksi-mobile-banking-capai-rp-4684-t
Kesharwani, A., & Bisht, S. S. (2012). The impact of trust and perceived risk on internet banking adoption in India: An extension of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
Laforet, S., & Li, X. (2005). Consumers’ attitudes towards online and mobile banking in China. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
Latip, H. F. M., Omar, A. H., Jing, T. M., & Shahrom, A. (2017). A Questionnaire-based Approach on Technology Acceptance Model for Integrated Multiple Ankle Technology Device on Patient Psychology. Sains Humanika, 9(3–2).
Laukkanen, T., & Lauronen, J. (2015). Consumer value creation in mobile banking services. May. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2005.007021
Lei, P., Wu, Q., & Pennsylvania, T. (2007). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling : Issues.
Lim, S., Melville, N. P., & Ross, S. M. (2013). Theories Used in Information Systems Research : Insights from Complex Network Analysis. 14(2), 2013.
Luarn, P., & Lin, H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. 21, 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
Lule, I. (2012). Application of Technology Acceptance Model ( TAM ) in M-Banking Adoption in Kenya. 6(1), 31–43.
Patel, K. J., & Patel, H. J. (2018). Adoption of internet banking services in Gujarat: an extension of TAM with perceived security and social influence. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2017). Mobile Banking Adoption in Thailand : An Integration of Technology Acceptance Model and Mobile Service Quality. XX(4), 200–210.
Rouibah, K., Abbas, H., & Rouibah, S. (2011). Technology in Society Factors affecting camera mobile phone adoption before e-shopping in the Arab world. Technology in Society, 33(3–4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.10.001
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling. Chapter 23 in Handbook of Psychology, Ed. IB Weiner.
Von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., Kirsch, I., & Yamamoto, K. (2012). The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. Springer.
Wong, W. H., & Mo, W. Y. (2019). A Study of Consumer Intention of Mobile Payment in Hong Kong, Based on Perceived Risk, Perceived Trust, Perceived Security, and Technological Acceptance Model. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 7(2), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.18178/joams.7.2.33-38
Yu, C. (2011). Factors Affecting Individuals To Adopt Mobile Banking : Empirical Evidence From The UTAUT Model. 104–121.
Copyright (c) 2022 Raju Wandira, Ahmad Fauzi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.