OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: September 30, 2022

Vice Chancellor's Leadership Policy in Improving Lecturer Performance: A Case Study in East Kalimantan

Zaenab Hanim, Lukman Priyandono, Rahmat Soe’oed
EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022), pp. 284-290 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1153 Published: 2022-09-30
Get Permissions

Abstract

This study aims to describe the formulation, implementation, constraints, and solutions of the vice chancellor's leadership policies in improving the performance of lecturers at private universities in East Kalimantan. This research uses a qualitative approach with the type of case study research. The data collection involved three informants, namely the Vice-Chancellor I for academics and planning, the Dean of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, and lecturers. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis used is the Miles and Huberman model, which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that: (1) the vice chancellor's leadership policies in improving lecturer performance were defining problems, analyzing problems, receiving suggestions and input from lecturers, deciding the best solution, and implementing policies, and (2) the obstacles faced by the vice chancellor when determining policies were discipline. lecturers, the competence of lecturers in the fields of research, scientific publications, and community service as well as the lack of Personnel for Research and Community Service Institutions, (3) the vice chancellor's efforts to resolve policy problems are to give advice to lecturers who are not disciplined, to give rewards to lecturers who obedience, increase the number of personnel for Research and Community Service Institutions and establish Partnership and Entrepreneurship Studies.

Keywords

References (36)

  1. Arfiandy, A. (2021). Pengembangan Mutu Dosen di Perguruan Tinggi. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 4(1), 155–166.
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
  3. Crosby, B. C., ‘t Hart, P., & Torfing, J. (2017). Public value creation through collaborative innovation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165
  4. Darsyah, S., & Chanifudin, C. (2020). Kebijakan Dalam Pendidikan. AT-Thullab: Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 116–133.
  5. Hanim, Z., Sari, D. S., & Soe, R. (2020). Principal ’ s Leadership Policy in Improving the Effectiveness of Teacher Performance. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 43–60.
  6. Herdiana, D. (2018). Sosialisasi Kebijakan Publik: Pengertian dan Konsep Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Wawasan Insan Akademik, 1(3), 13–26.
  7. Hermawan, I. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed Method). Hidayatul Quran.
  8. Himpunan Peneliti Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Himpunan Peneliti Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Penegakan Kode etik dan Perilaku Peneliti.
  9. Idris, I. (2020). Kajian Kebijakan Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru dan Dosen di Indonesia. Guru Tua: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 41–52.
  10. Jamali, Y. (2018). Manajemen Pengelolaan Konflik Di Sekolah. Sustainable Jurnal Kajian Mutu Pendidikan, 1(1), 113–131.

How to Cite

Hanim, Z., Priyandono, L., & Soe’oed, R. (2022). Vice Chancellor’s Leadership Policy in Improving Lecturer Performance: A Case Study in East Kalimantan. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1153