OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: June 30, 2023

Principals’ Toxic Leadership Behaviour and Teachers’ Workplace Incivility in Public Senior Secondary Schools, Lagos State, Nigeria

Nurudeen Olalekan Orunbon, Ganiyu Abiona Ibikunle
EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023), pp. 202-213 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1717 Published: 2023-06-30
Get Permissions

Abstract

This paper examines the connection between toxic leadership and workplace incivility among teachers in the selected public senior secondary schools in Lagos, Nigeria. Using the stratified sampling technique, 1,274 respondents consisting of 98 principals, 196 vice-principals, and 980 teachers were selected from a total population of 20,243. A structured questionnaire was used to collect quantitative data. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 24.0 was used to analyse quantitative data, and the Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used to test the hypotheses with the results shows that toxic leadership behaviour had a negative and non-significant correlation with teachers’ hostility in Lagos State senior secondary (r = -0.029, >0.05), and toxic leadership behaviour showed no significant correlation with teachers' withdrawal behaviour (r = 0.025, >0.05). The paper concludes that toxic leadership accounts for the derogatory treatment meted on teachers at work on Lagos State’s public senior secondary schools; and recommend the need for the Lagos State Education Districts to replace toxic leaders in schools with contemporary leadership styles that encourage team work and collaboration among teachers and allow participation in the process of decision-making.

Keywords

References (43)

  1. Ahmad, A., & Omar, Z. (2013). Abusive supervision and deviant workplace behaviour: The mediating role of work-family conflict. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 9(2), 124.
  2. Amos, K. S. (2013). Nursing faculty members' perspectives of faculty-to-faculty workplace incivility among nursing faculty members (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
  3. Baig, J., & Zaid, A. A. (2020). Behavioural Incivility and Leadership Styles: Assessing The Mediation of Job Strain, Employment Insecurity and Relational Injustice: A Conceptual Model. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9 (3), 687, 693.
  4. Barthelemy, R. S. (2020). LGBT + physicists qualitative experiences of exclusionary behaviour and harassment. European Journal of Physics, 41(6), 065703.
  5. Bartlett, J. E. (2008). Workplace Incivility: Worker and Organisational Antecedents and Outcomes. Online Submission.
  6. Brey, P. A. (2005). The importance of privacy in the workplace. Privacy in the workplace.
  7. Brouwers, M., & Paltu, A. (2020). Toxic leadership: Effects on job satisfaction, commitment, turnover intention and organisational culture within the South African manufacturing industry. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 1-11.
  8. Burns Jr, W. A. (2017). A Descriptive Literature Review of Harmful Leadership Styles: Definitions, Commonalities, Measurements, Negative Impacts, and Ways to Improve These Harmful Leadership Styles. Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership, 3(1), 33-52.
  9. Estes, B., & Wang, J. (2008). Integrative literature review: Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organisational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7(2), 218-240.
  10. Giacalone, R. A., & Rosenfeld, P. (2001). Self-presentation and self-promotion in an organisational setting. The Journal of social psychology, 126(3), 321-326.

How to Cite

Orunbon, N. O., & Ibikunle, G. A. (2023). Principals’ Toxic Leadership Behaviour and Teachers’ Workplace Incivility in Public Senior Secondary Schools, Lagos State, Nigeria. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(2), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1717