OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: March 31, 2024

Implementation of Biological Learning Management to Produce Productive Teachers

Akhmad
EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024), pp. 140-147 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2401 Published: 2024-03-31
Get Permissions

Abstract

The implementation of learning management plays a very decisive role in the teaching and learning process. The biology teaching and learning process is the core of the formal education process, with the teacher as the main actor. This research uses the field study method (Field Research). Sources of data in this study using the purposive sampling technique. The data collected are data collection (field notes), data reduction (data reduction), data display (data presentation), and conclusion drawing/verification. The results of this study are teachers are very skilled in prioritizing the ability to open lessons, prioritizing Mastery of learning materials, referring to planned teaching and learning activities, and prioritizing the ability to use learning media. The implementation of biology learning management in this study includes four main functions in education management: planning, organizing, acting, and evaluating. Thus, good school management certainly produces school principals with good educational management implementation and has productive teachers in the teaching process in schools.

Keywords

References (28)

  1. Abubakr, A. (2018). The role of educational supervisors towards improving teachers performance. Bauchi State University, February, 0–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323114130
  2. Akayoğlu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitaş, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4711
  3. Akpan, C. (2020). Educational management. In-Patient Child Psychiatry, January 2016, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203194195-24
  4. Alagona, P. S., & Simon, G. L. (2010). The Role of Field Study in Humanistic and Interdisciplinary Environmental Education. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590903200302
  5. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040208667488
  6. Creighton, T. (n.d.). School Personnel Administration and Instructional Supervision.
  7. Darishah, P., Daud, Y., Sofian, M., & Omar-fauzee, M. sofian. (2017). Teaching and learning supervision by school management, attitude of teachers and competency of teaching. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 6(10), 1367–1381. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohd-Sofian-Omar-Fauzee/publication/322099897_Teaching_and_learning_supervision_by_school_management_attitude_of_teachers_and_competency_of_teaching/links/5a44e91ea6fdcce19718f991/Teaching-and-learning-supervision-by-s
  8. Erpidawati, E., Gistituati, N., Marsidin, S., & Yahya, Y. (2019). The Development of the Academic Supervision Model Basic School Supervisor. 178(ICoIE 2018), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.5
  9. Farooq, M. S. (2016). Causes of low quality performance of public sector schools: An exploration. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 11(2), 31–52. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/iqtm/PDF-FILES/02-Causes of Low Quality Performance_v_xi_II_Dec_2015.pdf
  10. Genc, M., Genc, T., & Rasgele, P. G. (2018). Effects of nature-based environmental education on the attitudes of 7th grade students towards the environment and living organisms and affective tendency. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(4), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1382211

How to Cite

Akhmad, A. (2024). Implementation of Biological Learning Management to Produce Productive Teachers. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2401