OriginalPaper | Open access | Published: March 31, 2024

Exploring Generative AI Tools Frequency: Impacts on Attitude, Satisfaction, and Competency in Achieving Higher Education Learning Goals

M. Miftach Fakhri, Ansari Saleh Ahmar, Andika Isma, Rosidah, Della Fadhilatunisa
EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024), pp. 196-208 https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2592 Published: 2024-03-31
Get Permissions

Abstract

The urgency of using AI in the educational environment as a medium for optimizing student learning personalization in synchronous and asynchronous learning needs to be done to ensure that students experience improved attitudes, motivation, and learning satisfaction, which is reflected in student competencies. This study aimed to investigate the impact of ChatGPT use frequency on students' attitudes, satisfaction levels, and competence in higher education learning goals. The type of research employed was non-experimental quantitative research, specifically ex-post facto research. The sample size was 257 people, which was determined using the criteria of Issac and Michael (1971) and sampling distribution with a proportional random sampling technique. Data collection techniques that utilize questionnaires are effective in obtaining quantitative data. The PLS SEM analysis was used to determine the effect of exogenous latent variables on endogenous latent variables. The study revealed that reliability and satisfaction with ChatGPT positively impact learning outcomes, while the perceived impact on competence does not significantly enhance learning objectives. Increased usage frequency moderates these effects, diminishing the positive influence of perceptions, reliability, and satisfaction and shifting the impact on competence to negative and insignificant. These findings highlight the complexity of integrating ChatGPT into education, suggesting that initial positive perceptions may not be sustained with frequent use.

Keywords

References (61)

  1. Ali, J., Shamsan, M., Hezam, T., & Mohammed, A. (2023). Impact of chatgpt on learning motivation. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51
  2. Bai, S. (2023). Foreign language speaking anxiety among chinese english majors: causes, effects and strategies. Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2433–2438. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.5009
  3. Belcher, B., & Halliwell, J. (2021). Conceptualizing the elements of research impact: towards semantic standards. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00854-2
  4. Busch, F., Hoffmann, L., Truhn, D., Ortiz-Prado, E., Makowski, M. R., Bressem, K. K., Adams, L. C., & Consortium, C. (2023). Medical students’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study. In medRxiv (p. 2023.12.09.23299744). https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.09.23299744
  5. Chai, C. S., Rahmawati, Y., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Indonesian science, mathematics, and engineering preservice teachers’ experiences in stem-tpack design-based learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219050
  6. Chan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019). Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13930. https://doi.org/10.2196/13930
  7. Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., & Kent, C. (2020). Impact of an Artificial Intelligence Research Frame on the Perceived Credibility of Educational Research Evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(2), 205–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00188-w
  8. Demir, K., & Güraksın, G. E. (2022). Determining middle school students’ perceptions of the concept of artificial intelligence: A metaphor analysis. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.41.9.2
  9. Elder, H. (2012). An examination of Māori tamariki (child) and taiohi (adolescent) traumatic brain injury within a global cultural context. Australasian Psychiatry, 20(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856211430147
  10. Fietta, V., Zecchinato, F., Stasi, B. Di, Polato, M., & Monaro, M. (2022). Dissociation Between Users’ Explicit and Implicit Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence: An Experimental Study. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(3), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2021.3125280

How to Cite

Fakhri, M. M., Ahmar, A. S., Isma, A., Rosidah, R., & Fadhilatunisa, D. (2024). Exploring Generative AI Tools Frequency: Impacts on Attitude, Satisfaction, and Competency in Achieving Higher Education Learning Goals. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 4(1), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2592