Using PhET Interactive Simulations to Improve the Learners’ Performance in Science

Abstract
In the science section of the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), the Philippines came in last out of all the participating countries. Through a classroom-based research methodology, the study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using Physics Education Technology (PhET) to enhance learners' performance in science in grade 10. Thirty-three pupils from a public school in Ozamiz City were chosen by purposive sampling in the academic year 2023–2024. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used in the study; data were gathered through interviews and a test created by the researcher. To understand the results thoroughly, statistical analysis was conducted using Minitab and HyperResearch, utilizing methods such as mean, standard deviation, t-test, and theme analysis. The study aimed to achieve the following objectives: Determine the learners’ performance before using PhET interactive simulations; Determine the learners’ performance before using PhET interactive simulations; Identify significant difference in learners' performance before and after using PhET interactive simulation; and explore other observed developments among the learners after the use of PhET interactive simulation. The findings revealed an outstanding improvement in the learners’ overall performance following the integration of PhET interactive simulations into science learning. Therefore, the PhET interactive is an effective tool for improving the learners’ performance in science. This supports a recommendation that PhET simulations can be effectively incorporated to enhance students' understanding of scientific concepts.
References
Adams, W. K. (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Il nuovo cimento C, 33(3), 21-32.
ANIEROBI, E. I., NWOGBO, V. N., OGBE, I. J., & OYEYEMI, A. A. (2022). Academic Motivation and Self-Efficacy as Determinants of Academic Performance of Secondary School Students in Anambra State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advances in Research, 16(1), 22-31.
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among Malawian physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127-141.
Choudhary, F. R., Javeed, T., & Zaman, S. (2019). Learners and instructors’ attitude towards physics achievement at secondary level. Global Regional Review, IV, 441-449.
Chung, J., and McKenzie, S. (2020). “Is it Time to Create a Hierarchy of Online Student Needs,” in Tertiary Online Teaching and Learning. Editors S. McKenzie, F. Garivaldis, and K. R. Dyer (Springer Singapore), 207–215. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8928-710.1007/978-981-15-8928-7_19
De La Cruz, R. J. D. (2022). Science education in the Philippines. In Science Education in Countries Along the Belt & Road: Future Insights and New Requirements (pp. 331-345). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Diana Kwarikunda, Ulrich Schiefele, Joseph Ssenyonga & Charles Magoba Muwonge (2020) The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda, African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24:3, 435-446
Ekatushabe, M., Kwarikunda, D., Muwonge, C. M., Ssenyonga, J., & Schiefele, U. (2021). Relations between perceived teacher’s autonomy support, cognitive appraisals and boredom in physics learning among lower secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-15.
Fideli, H., & Aliazas, J. V. (2022). Enhancing Collaboration and Creative Thinking Skills through Technology Preparedness in a Mixed Learning Environment. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(4), 43-60.
Gani, A., Syukri, M., Khairunnisak, K., Nazar, M., & Sari, R. P. (2020, June). Improving concept understanding and motivation of learners through Phet simulation word. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, No. 4, p. 042013). IOP Publishing.
Inayah, N., & Masruroh, M. (2021). PhET simulation effectiveness as laboratory practices learning media to improve students’ concept understanding. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 152-162.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7-27.
Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 2020, 1-12.
Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2021). Students' Attitudes towards Physics in Nine Years Basic Education in Rwanda. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 648-659.
Olugbade, D., Oyelere, S. S., & Agbo, F. J. (2024). Enhancing junior secondary students' learning outcomes in basic science and technology through PhET: A study in Nigeria. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.
Olympiou, G., Zacharias, Z., & deJong, T. (2013). Making the invisible visible: Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation. Instructional Science, 41(3), 575–596.
Salam, R., Akib, H., & Daraba, D. (2020). Utilization of Learning Media In Motivating Student Learning. 226(Icss), 1100–1103.
Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhEt simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247.
Samitra, D., Firdaus, M. L., & Krisnawati, Y. (2023). Physics Education Technology Project (PhET): Interactive Simulation to Improve Students' Understanding of Concepts and Perceptions. Jurnal Paedagogy, 10(3), 646-654.
Sihombing, S., Silalahi, H. R., Sitinjak, J. R., & Tambunan, H. (2021). Analisis Minat dan Motivasi Belajar, Pemahaman Konsep dan Kreativitas Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Selama Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUDIKA EDUCATION), 4(1), 41–55.
Simanjuntak, M. P., Hutahaean, J., Marpaung, N., & Ramadhani, D. (2021). Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Combined with Computer Simulation on Students' Problem-Solving and Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 519-534.
Sitindaon, S. F., Bukit, N., & Turnip, B. M. (2020). The Effect of Guided Inquiry Learning Using PhET Media on Students' Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(21), 129-134.
Slavin, R. (2018). Educational psychology :Theory and practice (Twelfth ed). London: Pearson Education, Inc.
Solis-Foronda, M., & Marasigan, A. C. (2021). Understanding the Students' Adversities in the Science Classroom. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 8(1), 52-58.
Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H. F., ... & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 103830.
Whitehead, J. (2019). The underlying importance of context and voice in action research. The Wiley handbook of action research in education, 207-228.
Wirda, W., Mauvizar, E., Lubis, S. P. W., & Muzana, S. R. (2023). Utilization of PhET Simulations in Replacing Real Laboratories for Physics Learning. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 16(2), 71-79.
Yunzal Jr, A. N., & Casinillo, L. F. (2020). Effect of physics education technology (PhET) simulations: evidence from stem students’ performance. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 221-226.
Zhai, X., & Shi, L. (2020). Understanding how the perceived usefulness of mobile technology impacts physics learning achievement: A pedagogical perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 743-757.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (Ed.). (2021). Action research for change and development. Routledge.
Copyright (c) 2024 Abbie U. Dy, Jessel C. Lagura, Genelyn R. Baluyos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.